
Voters told Taproot they want better bike lanes and data, and worry about provincial involvement
Taproot's listening work with voters in the lead up to the 2025 municipal election in October reveals that many see active transportation infrastructure as an election issue.
At least 150 respondents told Taproot that active transportation infrastructure, like bike lanes and multi-use pathways, is a top election issue. While some said they were against bike lanes, most said they support adding and maintaining safe active transportation options. Some wanted infrastructure to feature better design and connections to other areas. Many suggested active transportation is interconnected with other city concerns, like transit, infill housing, and sprawl. Several specifically said they were concerned that the provincial government would interfere with the city's decisions on bike lanes. Others said they want to see data that proves that bike lanes are needed.
Earlier this year, we launched our listening campaign at several in-person and virtual events, as well as a 2025 election question on our site. We have been gathering responses ever since, and at last count, more than 800 people have provided them. The listening was built around a simple question: "What issues do you care about as you consider who to vote for in the 2025 municipal election, and why?"
One person told Taproot they were looking for a candidate who supports active transportation. "Utilitarian cycling in Edmonton is getting better all the time and we should keep building that capacity. Edmonton drivers are feeling the squeeze as roads get more congested, especially in densifying neighbourhoods like Ritchie," they said. "Multi-modal transport is the future! Communauto car share, cycling, transit, scooters, everything is needed to reduce personal car trips."
Another said they wanted to examine the voting record of incumbents on active transportation. "Which candidates are supportive of expanding bike lanes? Protected bike lanes? Which candidates have campaigned against or disparaged active transportation infrastructure in the past? Which candidates use public or active transportation themselves? Occasionally, or as a regular part of their daily activities?"
Still another emphasized they wanted high-quality bike infrastructure. "I would love to see bike lanes that don't just end, leaving cyclists on busy roads," they said.
A handful of respondents said they doubted whether the city's investments correlate to the number of people using active transportation infrastructure.
"I do not want taxpayer dollars wasted on pet projects," one said. "I want an accountability of the usage of the $100 million debt funding for the bike lanes. I want statistics to show the actual ridership numbers, and whether the program needs to be adjusted and by how much."
Beyond listening to voters, Taproot has worked to explain some of the intricacies of active transportation as we approach the 2025 election.